Guillermo Olaso vs Reda El Amrani Estadísticas cara a cara
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W W W L W W W W L
Form
W W W L W W L W L LCara A Cara: Olaso 1 - 0 Amrani
Ellas han jugado 2 conjuntos en total, con Olaso victoriosa 2 y Amrani victoriosa 0. El último partido entre Olaso y Amrani fue en el Palermo Challenger, el 24-09-2009, Cuartos de Second, Clay, con Guillermo Olaso obteniendo la victoria 6-2 6-2
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Guillermo Olaso | 1 |
| Reda El Amrani | 0 |
Palermo Challenger(24-09-2009)
6
2
6
2
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Keys VS Vekic PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
28 Apr 2025 / Fourth
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Dzumhur VS Arnaldi PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
28 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| GANADOR | PERDEDOR | MARCADOR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Partidos cara a cara | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Ganados | 0 |
| 12 | Juegos Ganados | 4 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Faltas dobles totales | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Tiempo promedio de partido | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Primer Servicio | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Pts Ganados Con 1st Serv. | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Pts Ganados Con 2nd Serv. | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Puntos de quiebre ganados % (total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % de ganancia de puntos devueltos | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | La mejor de 3 sets gana % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | La mejor de 5 sets gana % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % de victorias en desempates (total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | % De Sets Decisivos Ganados | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1er set ganado, partido ganado | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1er set ganado, partido perdido | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1er set perdido, partido ganado | 0% (1/0) |
Las estadísticas mostradas actualmente incluyen partidos de todos los niveles. Para excluir eventos de nivel inferior (según las estadísticas oficiales de ATP / WTA), usa el botón de alternar en el pie de página.
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Guillermo Olaso
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Sanhui Shin
Player
Guillermo Olaso
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guillermo Olaso
Player
Leo Vithoontien
62%
(
53 of
86)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
0
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
36%
(
12 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
75
Total Points Won
77
|
6-2 0-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guillermo Olaso
Player
Credit Chaiyarin
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Alexandre Muller
Player
Guillermo Olaso
80%
(
57 of
71)
1st Serve %
45%
(
38 of
84)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
8
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
66
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guillermo Olaso
Player
Edoardo Eremin
43%
(
19 of
44)
1st Serve %
39%
(
18 of
46)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Guillermo Olaso
Player
Hasan Ibrahim
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
3
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guillermo Olaso
Player
Jaroslav Pospisil
50%
(
24 of
48)
1st Serve %
46%
(
22 of
48)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Guillermo Olaso
48%
(
29 of
61)
1st Serve %
45%
(
32 of
71)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
7
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
77
Total Points Won
55
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Partidos Recientes Jugados Por Reda El Amrani
Before:
| OPONENTE | MARCADOR | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Christian Lindell
Player
Reda El Amrani
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve %
68%
(
23 of
34)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
6 of
23)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31
Total Points Won
26
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Mathias Bourgue
Player
Reda El Amrani
69%
(
75 of
109)
1st Serve %
54%
(
69 of
128)
0
Aces
10
9
Double Faults
16
64%
(
48 of
75)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
20 of
59)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
45 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
59 of
128)
123
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(2) 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Reda El Amrani
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Reda El Amrani
Player
Miljan Zekic
48%
(
33 of
69)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
3
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
3
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
43%
(
30 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
74
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Reda El Amrani
Player
Matthias Bachinger
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
64%
(
64 of
100)
0
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
18%
(
3 of
17)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
102
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefano Napolitano
Player
Reda El Amrani
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
19 of
27)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
10 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
58
Total Points Won
35
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Reda El Amrani
Player
Jan Mertl
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
23 of
49)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
16 of
23)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Reda El Amrani
Player
Marvin Netuschil
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
66 of
104)
4
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
8
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
38 of
66)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
42%
(
43 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
52 of
104)
111
Total Points Won
95
|
6-7(3) 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Reda El Amrani
Player
Artem Smirnov
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Ver Más
Desglose De Estadísticas Contra Todos Los Oponentes H2H
| Estadísticas | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61% (425/271) | Win/Loss | 61% (195/127) |
| 58% (944/677) | Sets Win/Loss | 60% (437/294) |
| 53% (7939/7062) | Games Win/Loss | 54% (3615/3020) |
| 61% (76/48) | Hard Win/Loss | 70% (33/14) |
| 61% (327/207) | Clay Win/Loss | 60% (155/103) |
| 61% (20/13) | Indoor Hard W/L | 44% (7/9) |
| 40% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.11 |
| 540 | Aces Total | 356 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 630 | Total Double Faults | 561 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 568.91 | Average Opponent Rank | 518.63 |
| 54% (7524/13961) | 1st Serve % | 58% (3903/6687) |
| 67% (5056/7524) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (2757/3903) |
| 49% (3185/6437) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (1260/2784) |
| 43% (611/1410) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (312/714) |
| 40% (5545/13840) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2767/6707) |
| 40% (6/9) | Slam W/L | 14% (1/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 78% (7/2) |
| 52% (16/15) | Main Tour W/L | 33% (5/10) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49% (107/110) | Challenger W/L | 50% (52/52) |
| 68% (296/137) | Futures W/L | 70% (130/57) |
| 62% (420/680) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (183/292) |
| 43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 64% (9/14) |
| 54% (106/196) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (29/67) |
| 60% (139/232) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (49/86) |
| 87% (414/360) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (182/159) |
| 13% (414/52) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (182/20) |
| 23% (282/65) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (140/37) |
Otras predicciones
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
Si buscas predecir partidos de tenis o fútbol, ¡Matchstat.com lo tiene cubierto! Tenemos estadísticas de ligas, jugadores y equipos, y nos especializamos en estadísticas detalladas h2h entre jugadores de tenis o equipos de fútbol.
Todas nuestras predicciones se basan en el aprendizaje automático y la inteligencia artificial. Matchstat está diseñado para ayudarte en tus análisis y predicciones, pero la responsabilidad de tus predicciones finales es tuya.
Es bueno hablar... Ponte en contacto con nosotros [email protected]
